Jump to content
The Hidden Fortress

how to make sure kids become as disturbed as possible


Mackie
 Share

Recommended Posts

this really made me see red just now:

 

4 -year-old Accused of Improperly Touching Teacher

 

Dec 9, 2006 05:51 AM

4 Year Old Accused of Improperly Touching Teacher

 

by Jennifer Kent

 

BELLMEAD- A four-year-old hugged his teachers aide and was put into in-school suspension, according to the father. But La Vega school administrators have a different story.

 

Damarcus Blackwell's four-year-old son was lining-up to get on the bus after school last month, when he was accused of rubbing his face in the chest of a female employee.

 

The prinicipal of La Vega Primary School sent a letter to the Blackwells that said the pre-kindergartener demonstrated "inappropriate physical behavior interpreted as sexual contact and/or sexual harassment."

 

Blackwell says it's ridiculous that the aide would misread a hug from a four-year-old. Blackwell wrote to administrators demanding that the whole incident be expunged from his son's academic file because his son is too young to know what it means to act sexually.

 

David Davis, the executive director of the Advocacy Center in Waco tends to agree with Blackwell. He says assuming the boy has not had sexual encounters, or been inappropriately exposed to pornography, most four-year-olds are sexually innocent.

 

Blackwell got a response from the La Vega administration. The sexual references on the discipline referral were removed. But the thing that makes Blackwell most upset is they told him "your request for an apology by the aide and removal of all paperwork regarding this incident is denied." Now the young student's file will refer to the incident as "inappropriate physical contact." And Blackwell says he will continue to fight the district.

 

La Vega I.S.D. administrators told News Channel 25 they couldn't comment on this case because of student privacy issues.

 

are they out of their collective mind?? the next thing will be that a baby boy is greeted in his new life right at birth with a lawsuit because it dared to touch his mother's vagina. this is so sick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:shock:

 

This is really disturbing.

I don't like this part - "assuming the boy has not had sexual encounters, or been inappropriately exposed to pornography". Even though David Davis supports the father, a comment like this just suggests that the next thing we hear about the case will be the parent under investigated for sexual abuse, because how else would the child know about "sexual behaviour"?

What is wrong with the mind of the teacher who reported this "incident"? It's truly disgusting that anyone can put that kind of spin on a toddlers cuddle. She must be one sick human being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's truly disgusting that anyone can put that kind of spin on a toddlers cuddle. She must be one sick human being.

yes, that's what i found really scary, too.

 

how can a child develop any kind of healthy relationship with a history like that? how is he ever going to be able to touch any female, in what way and context ever, without experiencing the chilly moment of - am i allwed to do that?

 

i think the (necessary) awareness of sexual abuse in families has brought with it already a sad by-product, in that a lot of fathers are afraid to cuddle their little ones. there have been quite a few incidents when things were construed as being sexual. that is bad enough, but i can see that it is important we keep our eyes open.

 

but this is just a new and sick kind of blindfolding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can believe it, sadly. But it's utterly ludicrous. My friend's 4-year old (smashing little lad, with wonderful parents) had a fixation with boobs and was inclined to grab at them if they were within reach - he just liked them! What would they have done to him?

 

It's all gone way past the point of stupidity - in schools you have to walk so carefully so as to not be misinterpreted; on outings - particularly with nursery groups -if a kid wants to hold your hand you have to back off and not do it, what message are we passing on to the kids? Not to touch? That all touching is 'dirty'? Contact with other humans is wrong?

:bb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can believe it, sadly. But it's utterly ludicrous. My friend's 4-year old (smashing little lad, with wonderful parents) had a fixation with boobs and was inclined to grab at them if they were within reach - he just liked them! What would they have done to him?

 

:yes: One of my Mum's pupils liked sitting in her lap best of all the staff as "you have comfy boobies like my Mummy". Little girl was obviously a lesbian deviant. I don't know how my Mum got through it :roll: Surely it's obvious that children are naturally drawn to breasts, having been fed by them - it's like us eyeing a good bottle of wine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is something you have to keep in mind at schools. We have some huggy kids and they do hug us. No one has complained so far.

As for kids only having been exposed to sexual situations at home, that's not true. I remember "playing doctor" with others kids before I started grade school. Natural curiosity just kicks in.

 

I hope that Dad keeps trying to get the record erased. Some smart lawyer should get ahold of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for kids only having been exposed to sexual situations at home, that's not true. I remember "playing doctor" with others kids before I started grade school. Natural curiosity just kicks in.

… and on that level it is important and healthy, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are they out of their collective mind?? the next thing will be that a baby boy is greeted in his new life right at birth with a lawsuit because it dared to touch his mother's vagina. this is so sick.

 

he might be accused of indecent exposure by the doctor and nurses.

 

did you know that you can be accused of sexual harassment by a co-worker, just by giving a friend a kiss and a hug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is RIDICULOUS. i'm amazed that the school didn't fire the teacher/ aide (aiding WHAT? *grrrr*) for even putting up such a ludicrous claim.

 

and what nonsense about children being exposed to sexuality only at home! aside from "playing doctor" as jude pointed out, look at what's on tv and newspapers. how can any child that can see not be exposed to sexuality? and why should being exposed to sexuality mean that any contact with an erogenous zone HAS to be sexual? that would mean every hug a sexually aware adult engages in is a sexual act.

 

most kids i can think of are fascinated with breasts. aside from everything else, they pop out. AND, from time to time, they bounce. that's the basis for almost all toys that kids are given. :lol:

 

absolute bollocks. strong thonking vibes to that teacher. idiot woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...